The Justification for Lying, Part I: Obama Is Chosen
Date: November 14th, 2008
Category: Ideology of Freedom
Throughout Barack Obama’s campaign for the presidency, as I watched him backtrack on the nature of his many questionable relationships, on issues such as gun control, abortion rights, and taxation, and on his feelings about the United States, the words of another famous revolutionary, Vladimir Lenin, kept coming to mind. Said Lenin, “To tell the truth is a petty bourgeois habit, whereas for us to lie is justified by our objectives.”
Lenin, along with Leon Trotsky and his other comrades in arms, was a character right out of the book Eric Hoffer published years later (in 1951): The True Believer. Whether it’s global warming or cooling, gay marriage, animal rights, or any other “cause,” a genuine true believer has no problem telling blatant lies in order to further that cause.
After all, if one believes that the end he seeks is truly noble, then any means is justified, no matter how immoral the means or how harmful they may be to others. As the esteemed college professor William Ayers dispassionately pointed out, “In revolutions, innocent people have to die.” His humanitarian words are enough to warm the cockles of your heart.
Which brings us to the man who managed to gain the presidency through an unofficial coronation by the mainstream media. Valid citizenship, Muslim connections, close ties to an organization responsible for massive voter fraud, longtime relationships with terrorists and anti-American zealots — and more — were simply off limits for discussion.
ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, Newsweek, et al. seemed to feel that asking The Chosen One any questions whatsoever about his dark past, his voting record as both a state and U.S. senator, and, above all, his own words would be an affront to his African-American heritage. (Has anyone bothered to notice that he’s also half white!)
When I refer to Obama as The Chosen One, it is not in jest. I believe he really was chosen. I’m not a big fan of conspiracy theories, but I do believe there has been a centuries-old, albeit loosely organized, conspiracy by GAVEC-driven people to establish a communist paradise on earth.
Never mind that we have already witnessed the realities of such a paradise — e.g., the Soviet Union, Cuba, North Korea, China, Mozambique … the list goes on and on. The fact that every instance of this paradise-on-earth fantasy has led to unimaginable poverty, torture, and death for millions of people seems not to have slowed the GAVEC-inspired goal for more of the same.
And little wonder: Those who lead communist revolutions live like kings! As in George Orwell’s Animal Farm, they ascribe to the ideology that “all animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.” I thought about this as I watched Obama walking through the White House with President Bush.
So, with the caveat that the worldwide conspiracy may have lacked centralized, coordinated planning over the years — especially since the fall of the Soviet Union — I honestly believe that Obama was chosen at a relatively young age as the person most capable of infiltrating the U.S. government and ultimately making it to the Oval Office.
If you’ve done any reading about Obama’s Muslim past, his mentoring by American communist Frank Marshall Davis, his close relationship (by his own account) with Rev. Jeremiah Wright, his long-term association with Bill Ayers … you should not find what I’m saying here to be the least bit inconceivable.
I believe what the paradise-on-earth crowd saw in Obama was a kid they could groom to “fit in” with the white power structure. They knew that a Sharpton-Jackson type of black would be too rough around the edges to be accepted.
Now, the man whose past has been carefully hidden from the public is about to become the chief executive of the once-proud American Empire — with a socialist Congress behind him! It might make a great novel, but it’s a sad reality for America.
So, now that Obama — through the grace of the Republican Party’s stupidity in nominating Mush McCain — has made it to the top spot, what can we expect? No one can be certain, but there are at least three options that come to mind, and in Part II of this article we’ll examine each of them.
November 14th, 2008 at 1:43 pm
Hey Tortoise,
Four of the big lies about Obama:
A. Racism might cost him the election: only 5% of blacks voted for McCain; 47% of whites voted for Obama, so which group is really expressing racism as they go into the ballot box? And which group’s racist voting pattern won the election for its candidate?
B. Racism based upon skin color is a white man’s issue only: the black community has been repeatedly shown to be unenthusiatic about darker-blacks (Clarence Thomas)while light-skinned blacks like Jesse Jackson and Obama are found somehow to be much more intelligent and “charismatic” then their “more African” brothers
C. Obama inspires the black community because he made it on his own: C1. While Obama did show marvelous scholarship at Harvard, the question the media never deigned to investigate was how, exactly, did he pay for Harvard? The Obama campaign says “hard work and student loans” but the question has been raised, did he actually have Muslim financial backing? The question has NOT been explored adequately and now it probably never will. C2 The Black community vilified Clarence Thomas a dark-skinned man who by all reports earned everything he got including his appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court . . . Thomas, you see, votes conservative and does not agree with affirmative action in any form. In a way, Thomas harkens back to Frederick Douglas who answered the question “How can we help the Negro?” by saying, “. . . get out of his way, let him stand on his own two feet and prove himself.” Blacks who do NOT espouse the “party line” that affirmative action in absolutely necessary are called “Uncle Tom’s” and cannot be considered truly part of the black community.
D. Obama is an upstanding citizen: Obama came in clear second to Hillary Clinton in the primary states but won an amazing 13 of the 14 caucus states (some of which held concurrent primaries) by illegally busing in out-of-state voters from next door (first one: Illinois people riding into nearby Iowa)state black communities; strong-arming; and outright fraud (of course any state stupid enough to use a caucus set up is leaving itself wide open to such tactics definitely deserves to see its results discredited). The DNC as well as the media refused to “disannoint” the chosen one despite thousands of provable and valid claims that were lodged. Here are just two of thousands of websites documenting the issue (search for “Obama caucus victories fraud” and you’ll get at least 234,000 web-hits):
ireport.com/docs/DOC-126863
texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/08/20/caucus-fraud-proof/
“Mr. Upstanding” doesn’t look so good once you start to look closer.
Bob VanDeHey
November 14th, 2008 at 2:40 pm
What difference does it make that he is half-white. So are many other African-Americans. When America considers a person’s race/ethnicity, any part African-American you are considered African American. No one has considered my Native American or White heritage either. We didn’t make the rules. The American government did. Maybe I miss understood your point. Could you further clarify why you made that comment?
November 14th, 2008 at 4:23 pm
With Obama as president, I hope that the change he brings is not the unmitigated disaster that I expect. That aside; what do you consider to be wrong w/gay marriage? It’s a voluntary relationship between consenting adults.
November 14th, 2008 at 8:11 pm
The test of any nation is the strength of its institutions and the value of its people and culture.
Even if the conspiracy were true, the USA would have to suffer a massive corruption of community values and major breakdowns in the checks and balances of its democratic institutions. Even with the support of a Congressional majority, that great institution has always proven a balance on the excesses of a President.
If teh USA is brought down by one man and the dark forces behind it, it was coming down anyway. I think that this prognosis is premature.
However, he will bear watching, just like all into whose hands we confer a measure of influence over our lives.
Meanwhile, let’s all get on with hte job of making our world a better place, day by day, hour by hour, relationship bey relationship.
Best
Geoff
November 15th, 2008 at 6:06 am
For anybody who still wants to glorify Obama as some altruistic, independent-thinking, rebel “change maker” with a penchant for critical-thinking, here’s something to chew on:
The Men Behind Obama:
http://www.wholetruthcoalition.org/2008/11/06/the-men-behind-obama/
A Two part interview with Webster Tarpley describing who is behind Obama and pulling the strings on the president elect and the plans behind it for the future. A must watch with brilliant insight and analysis
November 15th, 2008 at 12:11 pm
Something you might not know…certainly Glowbama would rather you did not…Obama reputedly helped steel workers in the Chicago area. South Town Star, a Chicago newspaper reported on 24 August 2007…”And none of the laid-off steelworkers Obama talks about in stump speeches, the people he was brought to Chicago to help, could be found for this article, despite repeated requests to the (Obama) campaign.”
I hope I am wrong. I expect to be correct…”Glowbama” might just turn out to be D’ohbama.
“Oft expectation fails, and most oft where most it promises.” W Shakespeare
November 16th, 2008 at 8:04 pm
Americans Today are too sorry to deserve any kind of consideration for their mass Stupidity. They elected a non-person expecting Change. They do not know what Change is. They deserve what they get… nothing. The America I know and Love intensely will not survive another 25 years because Americans are so unconscious they do not even know what is going on in the world today. They depend upon the mainstream media for information and the media is made up of LIARS>
November 17th, 2008 at 7:18 am
What’s “GAVEC?”
November 17th, 2008 at 7:44 am
Response to Brian Richard Allen:
GAVEC = Guiltism – Angerism – Villainism – Envyism – Covetism
November 17th, 2008 at 9:21 am
I went to the website referenced above by lwlmedia specifically:
http://www.wholetruthcoalition.org/2008/11/06/the-men-behind-obama/
and what it portrays (if I understood it correctly) is a Manchurian Candidate who looks like more like what is often called a “right wing warmonger” than a socialist. I had thought that Obama was a John Lennon “Imagine” type marxist. Interestingly enough, the emphasis on Afghanistan and military operations into Pakistan fit with what Tarpley is saying. If he is right (and I am not convinced that he is) then hang on we are in for a heck of a ride!